Scope is explicit
Repositories, cloud accounts, domains, applications, assets, and any authorized actions are scoped and approved independently.
How we protect the engagement
See how WEFT Security handles authorization, access, data, testing, evidence, and customer-controlled changes before work begins.
Delivery principles
These are engagement and technical boundaries, not certification claims. They describe how we separate scope, evidence, authority, and enforcement.
Repositories, cloud accounts, domains, applications, assets, and any authorized actions are scoped and approved independently.
Tool versions, rulesets, coverage states, scan scope, artifact validation, policy results, and material decisions stay attached.
Failed, missing, stale, partial, manual, and not-applicable coverage cannot silently become passing evidence.
Explicit permissions, approvals, change owners, cancellation paths, and audit evidence govern changes.
Source, DAST, cloud, container, and runtime workflows use bounded workers with separate credentials and execution limits.
Normalized evidence is allowlisted and redacted; raw source and workload traffic are not centralized by default.
Source and data handling
Local or customer-hosted execution can keep source and broader scanning beside private systems. Reports and shared evidence are reduced to what the team needs to understand and fix risk.
Control boundaries
Where hosted review is used, cloned repositories are removed after the job and reports retain bounded evidence rather than raw source.
Cloud work uses an explicit approved scope and customer-controlled or short-lived identity wherever practical.
Gateway, WAF, rate-limit, and runtime detection controls can run beside customer workloads.
Tool access never bypasses the agreed scope, customer role, change owner, or approval path.
Operational assurance
These practices describe current engineering behavior. They are not substitutes for an independent audit, certification, or customer-specific security review.
Scanner binaries, container images, rulesets, and generated manifests use explicit versions, digests, or hashes so upgrades are reviewable events.
Readiness, worker health, integration delivery, coverage errors, stale evidence, and partial scans remain distinct from passing state.
Security concerns can be reported directly to jawad@weftsecurity.com. Include reproducible impact without sending secrets or customer data.
Report a security concern →Trust questions
Need a customer-specific data-flow review?
Discuss your boundaryNo. We can organize technical evidence against supported frameworks, but do not present that evidence as certification, legal compliance, or an auditor's conclusion.
Supported local SAST and secret scanning can run through the local MCP process. Hosted workers use temporary workspaces and retain bounded evidence rather than repository contents.
Request bodies, headers, cookies, authorization values, raw Falco output, command lines, and event arguments are not accepted by the runtime event contract.
Email jawad@weftsecurity.com with the affected surface, reproduction steps, and impact. Do not include production secrets, personal data, or destructive proof.
Evaluate the real boundary
We will explain how the work fits, which data moves, and which controls and decisions stay in your environment.